The assembly of the Committee on Finance, Planning and Financial Improvement yesterday, Monday, within the Home of Councilors, dedicated to the overall dialogue of the invoice on finance for 2023, was an open assembly between the federal government and commerce unions.

On this regard, the commerce unions represented on the Council of Advisors took benefit of the presence of the Minister of Economic system and Finance, Nadia Fattah Al-Alawi, and Fawzi Lakjaa, the Minister’s Consultant to the Minister of Economic system and Finance, to direct plenty of criticisms of the federal government, accusing it of evading the obligations of the social settlement signed April 30.

Fatima Azkag, Democratic Confederation of Labor Parliamentary Counselor within the Home of Councilors, believes that “the September spherical of dialogue ought to have been a platform for fulfilling the federal government’s commitments associated to elevating public sector revenues, as proven within the textual content of the settlement, by means of a basic improve in wages and a evaluation of tax segments”. About revenue and create a brand new diploma. Sadly, the federal government has demonstrated its intransigence and evasion of its obligations with the invoice on funds.

The parliamentary adviser thought-about that the draft regulation on finance confirms the dedication of the federal government to neo-liberal tendencies beneath the pretext that the financial scenario within the nation and the state of public funds don’t enable this.

The member of the Democratic Confederation of Labor indicated that “the federal government’s argument is supported, on condition that financial efficiency has improved this yr because of tax and customs revenues, remittances from Moroccans residing overseas, income from the Sherifen Phosphate Authority, and elevated vehicle, aviation and textile exports; Which means that public funds usually are not as dangerous as the federal government portrays.”

The Parliamentary Counsel defined what she known as “intransigence” to the character of a authorities “which has proved past any doubt that it’s the political expression of capital and doesn’t concern itself with the social sphere, apart from the management of its safety.”

Azkag additionally identified that “this authorities provides nice legitimacy to the demand for the separation of cash and energy as a well-liked demand, which the Moroccan folks, with their vitality, known as for each time and in each social or subject motion. “

For his half, Noureddine Slick, parliamentary adviser to the Moroccan Commerce Union, accused the federal government of “going to a coverage of operating forward and never listening to susceptible teams in these circumstances, who’re witnessing unprecedented excessive costs for shopper items. ”

The Parliamentary Counsel famous that “what the federal government has provide you with within the finance invoice is opposite to what has been agreed with the commerce unions within the social dialogue, particularly with regard to the overall improve in wages and the discount in revenue tax.”
The identical parliamentarian additionally demanded an unique tax on gas firms, following the suggestions of the Competitors Council.

In flip, Khaled El Satti, parliamentary adviser to the Nationwide Labor Union in Morocco, stated: “The federal government has shied away from its obligations with some unions to lift wages,” referring to the statements of the accountable minister Faouzi Lakjaa on this regard. price range, to the press and to the Home of Representatives, by which he denied the federal government’s settlement with the unions on a basic improve in wages.

Al-Satti selected to learn some excerpts from the April 30 settlement to the economic system and finance minister, noting that it explicitly and clearly included a basic wage improve for public sector staff.

Then again, the identical adviser stated that “the federal government has shied away from its obligation to compensate the aged because it promised them within the authorities program.” September, as you promised them, however your guarantees abruptly evaporated.

Al-Sati additionally requested concerning the destiny of the beginning allowance for needy households, which was included within the state program, and added: “The state program promised needy households a beginning allowance of two,000 dirhams for the primary son and 1,000 dirhams for the second son. ranging from 2023, however this doesn’t have an effect on the draft regulation on finance.”

As well as, in response to the speeches of the representatives of the commerce union, Fawzi Lakjaa confirmed that the federal government determined in troublesome circumstances to begin social dialogue, and it might check with the disaster and resolve to not begin it, including: “The federal government took duty and launched social dialogue, and even institutionalized it, and within the first yr it price 9.2 billion dirhams.” Surprisingly, some have characterised the social settlement as easy and dangerous.

Lakyaa requested: “If 9.2 billion dirhams is little and nothing, then what’s quite a bit for you?” Declaring that every one social dialogues didn’t price greater than 14 billion dirhams, whereas the present social dialogue price 9.2 billion dirhams in a single yr, indicating the objectivity of the federal government’s name for price reductions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.